Jefferson vs. Macheveli - 1719 Words

Thomas Jefferson and Niccolo Machiavelli share similar and different thoughts on how a government should run. On how the government should function. From the rule of the government the rule of the people. However Machiavellis essay is more cynical, while on the other hand Jefferson is more logical. We might live in a Machiavellian world but it all depends on what people believe in. Personally I believe that Machiavellis philosophy is cynical compared to Jefferson, Therefore I believe more in Jeffersons piece which is far more realistic although Machiavelli still catches realism in the world we live today. â€Å"We hold these truths to be sacred amp; undeniable; that all mean are created equal....† One of Thomas Jeffersons examples of†¦show more content†¦Machiavelli also presents the idea that the power of a leader depends more on the qualities of the man than on of god. Thats the matter, loved and feared-qualities need there limits the same way as anything else in a social relation. Machiavelli himself stating that a man who makes himself loved than who makes himself feared; the reason is that love is a link to obligation, which men, because they are rotten, and will break any time soon. Machiavelli complicates the nation of good as purely subordinate power, arguing that the excess of â€Å"good† can actually do harm. In this case too much clemency can lead to uprisings and civil war. Cruelty what Machiavelli believes in, states that it can serve the greater good. I personally disagree with Machiavellis text, I think love is stronger than fear. A commander loved by his soldiers will defeat a commander feared by his soldiers in almost all battles, but the feared commander is less subject to arbitrary chance. Its not only love that can destroy a man, so can fear. â€Å"For its a good general rule about men, that they are ungrateful, fickle liars, and deceivers, fearful of danger, and the greedy for gain† Machiavelli stated. To me th is really caught my attention, because it reminded me of this years presidential election, between Romney and President Barack Obama. How in the debate, a lot of people and including myself over heard lies about both Romney and the President. Romney

The Popularity of Gangster Films in the Early...

The Popularity of Gangster Films in the Early Nineteen-Thirties The late 1920s in America was a particularly tumultuous period of time for the country. The Wall Street Crash in 1929 had led to high levels of unemployment and dissatisfaction within the country. The Depression (1929-1934), which was a direct result of The Wall Street Crash, led to a breakdown of industry and commerce within the country and weakened its global position as a superpower. People began to realise that the ideal which had been frequently promoted by governmental propaganda of The American Dream which suggested that success, in the democratic and classless society guaranteed by the†¦show more content†¦During this period the rise of urban gang rule and mobsters was unprecedented, mainly emerging from minority immigrant groups (Jewish/Italian/Irish). Initially the gangsters of the period were seen as high achievers as they were associated with the proletariat and seemed to be capable of rising above there roots, even during hard times in America, and achieve wealth. When considering the socio-economic factors it is easy to understand why such men were considered as gangster-heroes[3] who represented the people, however the only way that gangsters could achieve this wealth, subsequently fulfilling the American Dream, was by stealing it. Accruing capital meant accruing power over others[4]. Therefore it could be argued that the success gangsters exemplified was a perverse form of the American dream as it disregarded some of the key elements of the ideal. The fact that at this stage in America gangsters were the only group within society who could make upward mobility believable, tells much about how legitimate institutions had failed - but that mobility was still at the core of what Americans held to be the American dream[5]. In the early 1930s productions began within Hollywood of what were commonly described as social problem pictures[6], these films dealt specifically with the social difficulties of the period such as unemployment/labour struggles (Black

Couplings and Friends Comparison free essay sample

The show had low ratings, but its popularity soon increased and by the end of the third series the show had achieved decent ratings in the UK. It also aired in BBC America and surprisingly had a little success. Friends is an American sitcom created by David Crane and Marta Kauffman, which aired on NBC from September 22, 1994 to May 6, 2004. The series revolves around a group of friends in Manhattan. Filming for the series took place at Warner Bros. Studios in Burbank, California in front of a live studio audience. The series finale (the 236th episode), airing on May 6, 2004, was watched by 51.   million American viewers, making it the fourth most watched series finale in television history and the most watched episode of the decade. [ Comparison There are three males and three females in Coupling and Friends. In Friends, they always meet up at Central Park (cafe) to talk and in Couplings, they meet in a pub, which is conventional. We will write a custom essay sample on Couplings and Friends Comparison or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Couplings British fans have loved the series and love the humour and the dynamic of it and they have also said that Couplings, by far, is better than Friends because Friends has few basic, non going storylines that are not funny but they love the humour of Couplings. In my opinion, I think that Friends is more funnier than Couplings because as Friends started, the cast were in their mid 20s and they funny and had that sort of funny edge to them really. But when I watched the first episode of Coupling, I thought â€Å"great this show is for old people† because the cast looked old because they were in their late 30s. Some things were funny but not funny, meaning you could understand the joke, but you aren’t laughing out loud, that sort of thing.